Comments - Nobody Walks to Canterbury - by Will Manidis

Source: original

Minutes

SubscribeSign in

Nobody Walks to Canterbury

It is 1538. Read →

4 Comments

Top first

Kathleen Weber

Feb 17

I think you're wrong about why those why those rich guys buy those rare books. It's because they'll gain status when others see them on those shelves. It's kind of like a racing yacht used to be. When the fashion changes, something else will be bought. Hopefully. the rare books won't be dumped. In the modern world, the Center bounces around.

Reply (1)

Laurel

Feb 21

Like Gatsby

Reply

Cole Frank

Feb 19

Crucially the internet has neither a center nor a terminus

Reply

Peter

May 20

I really liked this article. Very interesting perspective.

It got me thinking about 2 other human drives that might intersect with this idea.

The first is man's apparent need for struggle in order to feel achievement and arrive at contentment/satisfaction/happiness. The pilgrimage to a shrine or a Michelin restaurant fulfill this.

The second is the attraction to rare things that cannot be easily reproduced or counterfeited. First edition books, classic cars, watches, art along with gold/bitcoin all share this characteristic. Their value is not utilitarian, but comes from the difficulty in obtaining or replacing them.

In a way, "store of wealth" is also a store of struggle and sacrifice. Wealth represents accumulated labour and, to some degree, rare talent/skill. So objects that act as a store of wealth may really just be objects that represent a store of these core human drives.

One last additional thought... The "rare books" example, may also reflect a cultural shift in status signalling. 30 or 40 years ago, status was often displayed through flashy cars, watches, etc. Today displays like that feel a little more crude. Books, art, etc. seem to be viewed more favourably and therefore are a more tasteful way to signal status, and store wealth.

In any case, thank you for the article and I hope I didn't just rephrase what you wrote.

Reply