Comments - Moonshot - by Scott Galloway - Prof G Media

Source: original

Prof G Media

SubscribeSign in

No Mercy / No Malice Newsletter

Moonshot

Boldly going farther Read →

35 Comments

Top first

Rob Mayo

Apr 17

I don't even consider myself an environmentalist, but we were so much more collectively concerned about the state of our own planet way back when Apollo missions were happening. The idea that we would continue to burn the fuel we do and trash planet Earth to the extent that we are doing, while chasing childlike dreams of interplanetary life, seems wrongheaded to me. We ought to commit to bringing our degradation of THIS planet to a zero state before spending more capital and funding on going to others.

Reply (1)

Alfred

Apr 17

100% The idea of space tourism is asanine.

Reply

Scott Brown

Apr 17

I'm all for using space to further humanity. But it bothers me how we have cut so much out of the social safety net. It brings to mind a little ditty by Gil Scott Heron:

A rat done bit my sister Nell

With whitey on the moon

Her face and arms began to swell

And whitey's on the moon

I can't pay no doctor bills

But whitey's on the moon

Ten years from now I'll be payin' still

While whitey's on the moon

The man just upped my rent last night

Cause whitey's on the moon

No hot water, no toilets, no lights

But whitey's on the moon

I wonder why he's upping me?

Cause whitey's on the moon?

Well I was already giving him fifty a week

With whitey on the moon

Taxes taking my whole damn check

Junkies making me a nervous wreck

The price of food is going up

And as if all that shit wasn't enough:

A rat done bit my sister Nell

With whitey on the moon

Her face and arm began to swell

And whitey's on the moon

Was all that money I made last year

For whitey on the moon?

How come I ain't got no money here?

Hmm! Whitey's on the moon

Y'know I just 'bout had my fill

Of whitey on the moon

I think I'll send these doctor bills

Airmail special

To whitey on the moon

Reply

Blake Ludwig

Apr 17

I think the most beautiful thing about Artemis is the crew all resoundingly once again looked back at our one beautiful and fragile Earth and gave conscious voice to protecting our spaceship Earth from devastation. Surely that is the priceless reminder of this last journey

Reply

Bruce Meyerson

Apr 17

Compelling, storytelling, as usual Scott. But... There's always a but from the peanut gallery... Why are we dissing African American physicist and astronaut Ronald McNair, who died on the Challenger as the SECOND African American astronaut, or Guy Bluford, the first, via the shuttle. With affection, from an

NYU Stern colleague.

Reply (1)

BaritoneWoman

Apr 18

. . .or Charles Bolden, astronaut and former NASA head.

Reply

LJ Johnson

Apr 17

Let’s not forget Sally Ride!

Reply

Bill L

Apr 18

The difference between JFK’s era and today is that everyone used to be able to agree that “we” meant “every American.”

The combination of social media, information silos, MAGA and Christian nationalist identity politics, and liberal/progressive identity politics has fractured JFK’s “we” into various iterations of “our tribe” - so when the mass shooting happens, or the trip around the moon happens, or somebody wins an Oscar or a Grammy, the first question is always “was it one of us or one of them?”

America won’t be capable of sustained great efforts until we find a way to conquer the selfish tribalism that stifles them.

Reply

Ken Chawkins

Apr 17

Enjoyed the article, as usual. I would encourage your readers to watch For All Mankind series (Apple+). Interesting storytelling sci-fi of sorts with one significant change in history...The Russians actually get to the Moon first! And all that transpires afterward - good and bad - is accentuated with AI, etc. Well done series if not a dark testament about the potential of human beings. Also previews the narrative of Artemis "We have to get there first before the Chinese. Whoever gets there first sets the rules." Can't believe that I've actually heard those direct words said out loud...Kind takes the romantic nature of the story away. Never mind...I'm still a sucker for the romance! Thanks Professor G!

Reply

Stephen Walsh

Apr 17

As always another fascinating insight from Scott. Although we do have space travel up thank for most of the technology we enjoy and use today, it’s hard to reconcile the sheer cost of space exploration with the sheer cost of financial deprivation and poverty that millions of earthlings experience daily. That’s not to say (wo)man shouldn’t go back to space or that space exploration isn’t good science, it is, it’s just it’s hard to justify the expense when ordinary people are struggling to put food on the table and gas in their cars.

Reply (1)

Roger Kaplan

Apr 18

That money is not fungible. Our budgeting system doesn't work that way. "We" (our "elected" leaders) determine and negotiate priorities, create the sausage that is the budget, and then fund it with national debt. There are no levers to take from one bucket and add to another. And there really shouldn't be if you think through it.

Reply

Colin Lowry

Apr 23

This post is not branded as the No Mercy/No Malice newsletter. But is it the No Mercy/No Malice newsletter? Please help to understand so I don’t miss Scott’s writing!

Reply

LC

Apr 20

One of the best issues of No Mercy / No Malice newsletters. Thank you for articulating the value of the space program to the economy and to the United States as a brand; had not considered NASA's brand value before. Great analysis.

Reply

Mo__

Apr 19

Did you live it… or are you living it now?

Understanding generations is sometimes as simple as asking Did you live it… or are you living it now?

Reply

Anthony Reinhart

Apr 18

Commander Wiseman's wife's name was spelled Carroll. I'm not pointing this out to be pedantic, but spelling names correctly is the least we writers can do.

Reply

Jacqueline Baptist

Apr 18

I'm usually in lockstep with you AND masculinity is most certainly sequestered to male people. Ask Christina Koch if she identifies with that term. Humanity or courage or adventuresomeness or civic mindedness have not had "toxic" tacked on to them and I would guess many women if asked would not aspire to masculinity.

Reply

Patrick Fekula

Apr 18

Scott,

One of your best...

Reply

E-star

Apr 18

I'm with astrophysicist DrBecky on this one https://youtu.be/K7Qg34MD0m0?si=g34VIaCbH4wgfVPN

Reply

Holly Barnes

Apr 18

I am so pleased to know whence the name of the mission came. For me, as a young adult, moon and other NASA exploration flights were not that uncommon. I was shocked to hear that it had been 50 years since those days. ‘bout time I say. Thank you, Scott.

Reply

Load More